Quality is built in from the planning stage, not just checked afterwards.
One system connecting graduate skills, the program as a whole, each course and teaching in practice.
Quality monitoring gives academic leadership and heads of department a complete picture, instead of relying on a sample that is not representative.
The dashboard does more than display data. It explains and justifies it, lets you ask questions and recommends how to improve, all in plain everyday language:
An in-depth syllabus review is hard to sustain, whether an institution teaches a few hundred courses or thousands. Reviewers and teaching and learning centers manage to read only a small share of syllabi, and the rest are published without anyone reviewing them.
CourseSophia's agents read every syllabus in depth: the learning outcomes, the alignment between outcomes, activities and assessment, teaching methods, workload and the role of AI. They note what is in order and what needs correcting, and the reviewer at the institution makes the decision.
Every institution can define the skills it gives its graduates. CourseSophia spreads them across every part of the program, from the graduate profile to the teaching in each course, and shows leadership how well they are being acquired across the institution.
The institution decides which skills its graduates will bring to the workplace and to society, according to its vision, fields and programs.
The agents translate the graduate skills into the skills students will acquire in each course, in line with the program.
As part of course planning, the lecturer decides through which activities and assignments students will acquire the course skills.
Skill acquisition across each program and institution-wide, by year, faculty and department.
The institution can show students, employers and any reviewing body which skills its graduates acquire, and where.
Knowledge is available to everyone, AI is changing the role of higher education, and what graduates can do is becoming more important than what they know. To lead this change, an institution needs to see the whole learning cycle, from the program to the teaching that actually happens.
When any information is a search away, the value of a degree is measured more and more by the skills graduates acquire. The program needs to define them, spread them across courses and show that they are acquired.
AI tools write, summarize and solve for the student. Institutions need to redefine their role in educating young people and decide, in every course, what role AI plays, so that it supports learning rather than replacing thinking.
Most tools handle one part: course management, syllabus writing or reporting. CourseSophia connects the program, the courses, the teaching and the dashboard in one system.
Clear, measurable indicators for teaching, learning and skill acquisition that can be presented to leadership, committees and any reviewing body.
A program with a defined, up-to-date graduate profile, grounded in the needs of employment and the field, is easier to present to applicants.
The information comes from work lecturers do anyway: building the course and writing the syllabus. No extra forms and no annual survey.
The academic program defines what each course contributes to the graduate. Courses are built accordingly, and actual teaching comes back as a status view that lets the program be updated over time.
The academic program defines what graduates need to know and be able to do when they complete the degree. CourseSophia helps draft the program, decide what each course contributes to it, and check on an ongoing basis whether the courses, together, actually get the graduate there.
Choose a graduate outcome to see in which courses it is taught, and to what level.
| Data literacy | Critical thinking | Science communication | Ethical judgment | Teamwork | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intro to Data Science | Introduced | Introduced | Introduced | ||
| Statistics I | Reinforced | Introduced | Introduced | ||
| Research Methods | Reinforced | Reinforced | Introduced | ||
| Machine Learning | Mastered | Reinforced | Reinforced | Reinforced | |
| Data Ethics Seminar | Mastered | Reinforced | Introduced | ||
| Capstone Project | Assessed | Assessed | Mastered | Missing | Assessed |
Ethical judgment is taught at the introductory level only. No course takes it to mastery or assessment before graduation.
The four levels describe how far a course advances a graduate outcome. The example is for illustration only and is not based on institutional data.
Sophia proposes a draft of the program goals and graduate outcomes based on the institution's strategic documents. The program head edits and approves.
Each course is assigned the graduate outcomes it serves and to what level. The program sets what the course contributes and does not interfere with the course content itself.
A coverage map compares what was assigned to each course with what the course states in its syllabus, and flags where a decision is needed.
An outcome taught at the introductory level, with no course taking it to mastery or assessment.
Two courses cover the same outcome at the same level.
The syllabus was updated, and the course no longer serves what was assigned to it.
A course assumes knowledge that is taught only in a later course.
When the institution turns it on, actual achievement can be compared with the plan, to decide whether the program itself needs to change.
Sophia is available in a side panel on every screen and routes each request to the right agent. Each agent draws on institutional knowledge and data in real time, checks the result, and shows where every answer came from.
A team of AI agents with broad academic knowledge, adaptable to any institution. At every stage and level, control and the final decision are yours.
CourseSophia works inside Moodle, an environment the institution and its lecturers already know.
Learning outcomes, knowledge and skill levels, units, sessions and learning activities. The result goes straight into Moodle and into the syllabus.
An in-depth review of every syllabus by the agents, and an approval workflow with each unit's reviewers and approvers.
Indicators for active learning, depth of learning and AI integration, with plain-language questions and recommendations, by year, faculty and department.
Sophia works in both languages, and the interface supports right-to-left writing.
The institution's pedagogical model, syllabus template, organizational structure and tool catalog.
Ten complete courses (currently in Hebrew) where you can work with Sophia and the dashboard. Access is given to staff of academic institutions, with approval from the Sophia-AI team. Request access or sign in
Lecturers see pedagogical terms. The teaching and learning center sees the codes and indicators it already knows. CourseSophia follows each institution's own division of academic responsibility.
An institutional system should not be complicated for the institution. Each institution is assigned a personal implementation guide from the Sophia-AI team, who works with its staff from the start until the system runs as part of routine work.
One department or one program, according to what matters to the institution now. There is no need to roll out the whole system on day one.
Together with the institution, the guide sets up the pedagogical model, the syllabus template and the organizational structure, and trains lecturers and staff.
Once the first stage is running, the system expands to more departments and programs. The guide continues to support the institution along the way.
In the conversation we look at one of your programs: which skills and graduate outcomes it defines, how the courses deliver them, and where it makes sense to begin.
To schedule a conversation: info@sophia-ai.tech